EN
A Comparative Study on the Performance Analysis of Feature Extractors Used in Augmented Reality Applications under Various Image Conditions
Abstract
Until today, various approaches have been proposed in order to create Augmented Reality (AR) environment where virtual-real integration takes place. One of these approaches is vision-based model, and it is divided into two branches as Marker-Based Augmented Reality (MBAR) and Markerless Augmented Reality (MAR). In the use of MBAR model, a reference image is introduced to the system before, and when this image enters the camera view, an AR environment is created. However, in MAR model, no image is introduced to the system before. Instead, it uses natural characteristics present in the image, such as edges, corners, and geometrical shapes to create an AR environment. In order to use MAR model, it is necessary to use algorithms which require high processing power and memory capacity. Within the scope of this study, MAR model was chosen as reference and an evaluation on combinations of descriptive extractors (such as ORB, SIFT, and SURF) and matchers (such as Bruteforce, Bruteforce-Hamming, and Flannbase) was presented. In this context, it was aimed that we could obtain knowledge about i) the number of key points and detection time with the use of different descriptor extractors, and ii) the number of matching key points and the amount of positional deviation of a virtual object placed on a real world scene with the use of different matchers. In line with this goal, analyses were made, using different image scales and brightness levels on both PC and mobile platforms. Results showed that, for both platforms, combinations using ORB method could work faster with less deviation than the combinations using other methods in all conditions. In addition, RANSAC algorithm was also used to reduce the total mean deviation ratio, and it was seen that the rate could be reduced from 70% to 4.5%..
Keywords
References
- [1] Azuma, R. T. (1997). A Survey Of Augmented Reality. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355-385.
- [2] Milgram, P., & Kishino, F. (1994). A Taxonomy Of Mixed Reality Visual Displays.Ieice Transactions On Information And Systems, 77(12), 1321-1329.
- [3] Ufkes, A., & Fiala, M. (2013, May). A Markerless Augmented Reality System For Mobile Devices. In 2013 International Conference On Computer And Robot Vision (pp. 226-233). IEEE.
- [4] Gonzato, J. C., Arcila, T., & Crespin, B. (2008). Virtual Objects On Real Oceans. In Graphicon'2008 (Pp. 49-54).
- [5] Keskin, N. Ö., & Kilinç, A. G. H. (2015). Mobil Öğrenme Uygulamalarına Yönelik Geliştirme Platformlarının Karşılaştırılması ve Örnek Uygulamalar. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları Ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(3), 68-90.
- [6] Korucu, A. T., & Biçer, H. (2019). Mobil Öğrenme: 2010-2017 Çalışmalarına Yönelik Bir İçerik Analizi. Trakya Eğitim Dergisi, 9(1), 32-43.
- [7] Avcı, A. F., & Taşdemir, Ş. (2019). Artırılmış Ve Sanal Gerçeklik ile Periyodik Cetvel Öğretimi. Selcuk University Journal Of Engineering Sciences, 18(2), 68-83.
- [8] Uzun, Y., Bilban, M., & Kalaç, M. Ö. (2018). Artırılmış Gerçeklik Kullanılarak Engelli Çocukların Öğrenme Yeteneklerinin Geliştirilmesi. Uluslararası Engelsiz Bilişim Kongresi.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Engineering
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
December 31, 2022
Submission Date
January 31, 2022
Acceptance Date
October 18, 2022
Published in Issue
Year 1970 Volume: 6 Number: 2
APA
Akman, C., & Gumus, E. (2022). A Comparative Study on the Performance Analysis of Feature Extractors Used in Augmented Reality Applications under Various Image Conditions. Journal of Innovative Science and Engineering, 6(2), 259-278. https://doi.org/10.38088/jise.1061166
AMA
1.Akman C, Gumus E. A Comparative Study on the Performance Analysis of Feature Extractors Used in Augmented Reality Applications under Various Image Conditions. JISE. 2022;6(2):259-278. doi:10.38088/jise.1061166
Chicago
Akman, Ceren, and Ergun Gumus. 2022. “A Comparative Study on the Performance Analysis of Feature Extractors Used in Augmented Reality Applications under Various Image Conditions”. Journal of Innovative Science and Engineering 6 (2): 259-78. https://doi.org/10.38088/jise.1061166.
EndNote
Akman C, Gumus E (December 1, 2022) A Comparative Study on the Performance Analysis of Feature Extractors Used in Augmented Reality Applications under Various Image Conditions. Journal of Innovative Science and Engineering 6 2 259–278.
IEEE
[1]C. Akman and E. Gumus, “A Comparative Study on the Performance Analysis of Feature Extractors Used in Augmented Reality Applications under Various Image Conditions”, JISE, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 259–278, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.38088/jise.1061166.
ISNAD
Akman, Ceren - Gumus, Ergun. “A Comparative Study on the Performance Analysis of Feature Extractors Used in Augmented Reality Applications under Various Image Conditions”. Journal of Innovative Science and Engineering 6/2 (December 1, 2022): 259-278. https://doi.org/10.38088/jise.1061166.
JAMA
1.Akman C, Gumus E. A Comparative Study on the Performance Analysis of Feature Extractors Used in Augmented Reality Applications under Various Image Conditions. JISE. 2022;6:259–278.
MLA
Akman, Ceren, and Ergun Gumus. “A Comparative Study on the Performance Analysis of Feature Extractors Used in Augmented Reality Applications under Various Image Conditions”. Journal of Innovative Science and Engineering, vol. 6, no. 2, Dec. 2022, pp. 259-78, doi:10.38088/jise.1061166.
Vancouver
1.Ceren Akman, Ergun Gumus. A Comparative Study on the Performance Analysis of Feature Extractors Used in Augmented Reality Applications under Various Image Conditions. JISE. 2022 Dec. 1;6(2):259-78. doi:10.38088/jise.1061166
