Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Eriyik Yığma Modellemesi Esaslı Üç Boyutlu (3B) Eklemeli Üretim Tekniği Kullanılarak Poliüretan Malzemeden Bir Yapay İnsan Kulak Kepçesi Üretimi

Year 2019, Volume: 23 Issue: 2, 666 - 672, 25.08.2019

Hurşit Sefa Aydın Ömer Yunus Gümüş İsrafil Küçük

https://doi.org/10.19113/sdufenbed.540029
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Son
yıllarda 3B baskı teknolojileri sahip olduğu yüksek üretim hızı, uygun maliyeti
ve biyouyumlu malzeme üretimine imkan veren özellikleriyle yapay organ
geliştirme alanına önemli yenilikler getirmiştir. Bu çalışmada, eriyik yığma
modellemesi (EYM) özelliğine sahip bir 3B yazıcı kullanarak poliüretan (PU)
polimeriyle hacimsel olarak farklı doluluk oranlarında (%25, %50, %75 ve %100)
yapay insan kulak kepçesi üretimi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Kimyasal yapı
analizleri için Fourier dönüşümlü kızılötesi (FTIR) spektroskopisi, termal
analizler için termogravimetrik analiz (TGA) cihazı, yüzey görüntülerini
incelemek için stereomikroskop ve taramalı elektron mikroskobu (SEM), mekanik
ölçümler için sertlik ve çekme testi cihazları kullanılmıştır. Geliştirilen
yapay kulak kepçelerinden en uygun tasarımın %50 doluluk oranına sahip olan
kulak tasarımı olduğu belirlenmiştir.

Keywords

3B baskı EYM Yapay organ Poliüretan

References

  • [1] Suaste-Gómez, E., Rodríguez-Roldán, G., Reyes-Cruz, H., Terán-Jiménez, O. 2016. Developing an Ear Prosthesis Fabricated in Polyvinylidene Fluoride by a 3D Printer with Sensory Intrinsic Properties of Pressure and Temperature. Sensors, 16(3), 332-342.
  • [2] Park, C., Yoo, Y-S., Hong, S-T. 2010. An update on auricular reconstruction: Three major auricular malformations of microtia, prominent ear and cryptotia. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, 18(6), 544-549.
  • [3] Mi, H-Y., Salick, M. R., Jing, X., Jacques, B. R., Crone, W. C., Peng, X-F., Turng, L-S. 2013. Characterization of thermoplastic polyurethane/polylactic acid (TPU/PLA) tissue engineering scaffolds fabricated by microcellular injection molding. Materials Science and Engineering C, 33(8), 4767-4776.
  • [4] Ngo, T. D., Kashani, A., Imbalzano G., Nguyen, K. T. Q., Hui, D. 2018. Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Composites Part B: Engineering, 143, 172-196.
  • [5] Bakar, N. S. A., Alkahari, M. R., Boejang, H. 2010. Analysis on fused deposition modelling performance. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 11(12), 972–977.
  • [6] Hohimer, C., Christ, J., Aliheidari, N., Mo, C., Ameli, A. 2017. 3D printed thermoplastic polyurethane with isotropic material properties. Proceeding of SPIE, Behavior and Mechanics of Multifunctional Materials and Composites, 10165(11), 277-286.
  • [7] Brenken, B., Barocio, E., Favaloro, A., Kunc, V., Pipes, R. B. 2018. Fused filament fabrication of fiber-reinforced polymers: A review. Additive Manufacturing, 21, 1-16.
  • [8] Zeng, W., Lin, F., Shi, T., Zhang, R., Nian, Y., Ruan, J., Zhou, T. 2008. Fused deposition modelling of an auricle framework for microtia reconstruction based on CT images. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 14(5) 280-284.
  • [9] Przybytek, A., Gubańska, I., Kucińska-Lipka, J., Janik, H. 2018. Polyurethanes as a Potential Medical-Grade Filament for Use in Fused Deposition Modeling 3D Printers - a Brief Review. FIBRES & TEXTILES in Eastern Europe, 26, 6(132), 120-125.
  • [10] Chohan, J. S., Singh, R., Boparai, K. S., Penna, R., Fraternali, F. 2017. Dimensional accuracy analysis of coupled fused deposition modeling and vapour smoothing operations for biomedical applications.Composites Part B, 117, 138–149.
  • [11] Mohamed, O. A., Masood, S. H., Bhowmik, J. L. 2016. Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters for dimensional accuracy using I-optimality criterion. Measurement, 81, 174-196.
  • [12] Mohamed, O. A., Masood, S. H., Bhowmik, J. L. 2015. Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters: a review of current research and future prospects. Additive Manufacturing, 3(1), 42-53.
  • [13] Chung, M., Radacsi, N., Robert, C., McCarthy, E. D., Callanan, A., Conlisk, N., Hoskins, P. R., Koutsos, V. 2018. On the optimization of low-cost FDM 3D printers for accurate replication of patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysm geometry. 3D Printing in Medicine, 4(2), 1-10.
  • [14] Ulağ, S., Kalkandelen, C., Oktar F. N., Uzun, M., Şahin, Y, M., Karademir, B., Arslan, S., Kılıç, O., Ekren, N., Gündüz, O. 2018. 3 Boyutlu Yazıcı ile Polikaprolakton/Kitosan/Hidrojel Bazlı Küçük Çaplı Yapay Damar Üretimi. 23. Biyomedikal Bilim ve Teknoloji Sempozyumu, 15-16 Aralık, İstanbul, 34.
  • [15] Dong, Z., Li, Y., Zou, Q. 2009. Degradation and biocompatibility of porous nano hydroxyapatite/polyurethane composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Applied Surface Science, 255(12), 6087-6091.
  • [16] Lee, M., Koo, J., Ki, H., Lee, K. H., Min B. H., Lee, Y. C., Kim, J. H. 2017. Phase Separation and Electrical Conductivity of Nanocomposites Made of Ether-/Ester-based Polyurethane Blends and Carbon Nanotubes. Macromolecular Research, 25(3), 231-242.
  • [17] Han, B., Cheng, A., Ji, G., Wu, S., Shen, J. 2004. Effect of Organophilic Montmorillonite on Polyurethane/Montmorillonite Nanocomposites. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 91(4), 2536-2542.
  • [18] Petrović, Z. S., Javni, I., Waddon, A., Bánhegyi, G. 2000. Structure and Properties of Polyurethane-Silica Nanocomposites. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 76(2), 133–151.
  • [19] Xia, H., Song, M. 2005 Preparation and characterization of polyurethane-carbon nanotube composites. Soft Matter, 1(5), 386-394.
  • [20] Cangemi, J. M., Neto, S. C., Chierice, G. O., dos Santos, A. M. 2006. Study of the Biodegradation of a Polymer Derived from Castor Oil by Scanning Electron Microscopy, Thermogravimetry and Infrared Spectroscopy. Polímeros: Ciência e Tecnologia, 16, (2), 129-135.
  • [21] ASTM International. 2017. D2240-15 Standard Test Method for Rubber Property-Durometer Hardness, Planning Technology Inc, 13s. New Hampshire, ABD.
  • [22] Qi, H. J., Boyce, M. C. 2005. Stress-strain behavior of thermoplastic polyurethanes. Mechanics of Materials, 37(8), 817-839.
  • [23] Petrovic, Z. S., Ferguson, J. 1992. Polyurethane Elastomers. Progress in Polymer Science, 16(5), 695-836.

Production of an Artificial Human Auricle from Polyurethane by Using Three Dimensional (3D) Additive Manufacturing Technique Based Fused Deposition Modelling

Year 2019, Volume: 23 Issue: 2, 666 - 672, 25.08.2019

Hurşit Sefa Aydın Ömer Yunus Gümüş İsrafil Küçük

https://doi.org/10.19113/sdufenbed.540029
Cited By: 1

Abstract

In
recent years, 3D printing technologies have brought significant innovations in
the field of artificial organ development due to their properties such as high
production speed, cost effective and enabling fabrication of biocompatible
materials. In this study, artificial human auricles were produced in different
infill rates (25%, 50%, 75% and 100%) volumetrically with polyurethane (PU)
polymer by using a 3D printer based on fused deposition modelling (FDM).
Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analyzer
(TGA), stereomicroscope, scanning electron microscope (SEM), hardness tester
and tensile test machine were used for chemical structure analysis, thermal
analysis, surface images and mechanical measurements respectively. It was
determined that the most suitable design among the developed artificial
auricles is the auricle having 50% infill rate.

Keywords

3D printing FDM Artificial organ Polyurethane

References

  • [1] Suaste-Gómez, E., Rodríguez-Roldán, G., Reyes-Cruz, H., Terán-Jiménez, O. 2016. Developing an Ear Prosthesis Fabricated in Polyvinylidene Fluoride by a 3D Printer with Sensory Intrinsic Properties of Pressure and Temperature. Sensors, 16(3), 332-342.
  • [2] Park, C., Yoo, Y-S., Hong, S-T. 2010. An update on auricular reconstruction: Three major auricular malformations of microtia, prominent ear and cryptotia. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, 18(6), 544-549.
  • [3] Mi, H-Y., Salick, M. R., Jing, X., Jacques, B. R., Crone, W. C., Peng, X-F., Turng, L-S. 2013. Characterization of thermoplastic polyurethane/polylactic acid (TPU/PLA) tissue engineering scaffolds fabricated by microcellular injection molding. Materials Science and Engineering C, 33(8), 4767-4776.
  • [4] Ngo, T. D., Kashani, A., Imbalzano G., Nguyen, K. T. Q., Hui, D. 2018. Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Composites Part B: Engineering, 143, 172-196.
  • [5] Bakar, N. S. A., Alkahari, M. R., Boejang, H. 2010. Analysis on fused deposition modelling performance. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 11(12), 972–977.
  • [6] Hohimer, C., Christ, J., Aliheidari, N., Mo, C., Ameli, A. 2017. 3D printed thermoplastic polyurethane with isotropic material properties. Proceeding of SPIE, Behavior and Mechanics of Multifunctional Materials and Composites, 10165(11), 277-286.
  • [7] Brenken, B., Barocio, E., Favaloro, A., Kunc, V., Pipes, R. B. 2018. Fused filament fabrication of fiber-reinforced polymers: A review. Additive Manufacturing, 21, 1-16.
  • [8] Zeng, W., Lin, F., Shi, T., Zhang, R., Nian, Y., Ruan, J., Zhou, T. 2008. Fused deposition modelling of an auricle framework for microtia reconstruction based on CT images. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 14(5) 280-284.
  • [9] Przybytek, A., Gubańska, I., Kucińska-Lipka, J., Janik, H. 2018. Polyurethanes as a Potential Medical-Grade Filament for Use in Fused Deposition Modeling 3D Printers - a Brief Review. FIBRES & TEXTILES in Eastern Europe, 26, 6(132), 120-125.
  • [10] Chohan, J. S., Singh, R., Boparai, K. S., Penna, R., Fraternali, F. 2017. Dimensional accuracy analysis of coupled fused deposition modeling and vapour smoothing operations for biomedical applications.Composites Part B, 117, 138–149.
  • [11] Mohamed, O. A., Masood, S. H., Bhowmik, J. L. 2016. Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters for dimensional accuracy using I-optimality criterion. Measurement, 81, 174-196.
  • [12] Mohamed, O. A., Masood, S. H., Bhowmik, J. L. 2015. Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters: a review of current research and future prospects. Additive Manufacturing, 3(1), 42-53.
  • [13] Chung, M., Radacsi, N., Robert, C., McCarthy, E. D., Callanan, A., Conlisk, N., Hoskins, P. R., Koutsos, V. 2018. On the optimization of low-cost FDM 3D printers for accurate replication of patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysm geometry. 3D Printing in Medicine, 4(2), 1-10.
  • [14] Ulağ, S., Kalkandelen, C., Oktar F. N., Uzun, M., Şahin, Y, M., Karademir, B., Arslan, S., Kılıç, O., Ekren, N., Gündüz, O. 2018. 3 Boyutlu Yazıcı ile Polikaprolakton/Kitosan/Hidrojel Bazlı Küçük Çaplı Yapay Damar Üretimi. 23. Biyomedikal Bilim ve Teknoloji Sempozyumu, 15-16 Aralık, İstanbul, 34.
  • [15] Dong, Z., Li, Y., Zou, Q. 2009. Degradation and biocompatibility of porous nano hydroxyapatite/polyurethane composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Applied Surface Science, 255(12), 6087-6091.
  • [16] Lee, M., Koo, J., Ki, H., Lee, K. H., Min B. H., Lee, Y. C., Kim, J. H. 2017. Phase Separation and Electrical Conductivity of Nanocomposites Made of Ether-/Ester-based Polyurethane Blends and Carbon Nanotubes. Macromolecular Research, 25(3), 231-242.
  • [17] Han, B., Cheng, A., Ji, G., Wu, S., Shen, J. 2004. Effect of Organophilic Montmorillonite on Polyurethane/Montmorillonite Nanocomposites. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 91(4), 2536-2542.
  • [18] Petrović, Z. S., Javni, I., Waddon, A., Bánhegyi, G. 2000. Structure and Properties of Polyurethane-Silica Nanocomposites. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 76(2), 133–151.
  • [19] Xia, H., Song, M. 2005 Preparation and characterization of polyurethane-carbon nanotube composites. Soft Matter, 1(5), 386-394.
  • [20] Cangemi, J. M., Neto, S. C., Chierice, G. O., dos Santos, A. M. 2006. Study of the Biodegradation of a Polymer Derived from Castor Oil by Scanning Electron Microscopy, Thermogravimetry and Infrared Spectroscopy. Polímeros: Ciência e Tecnologia, 16, (2), 129-135.
  • [21] ASTM International. 2017. D2240-15 Standard Test Method for Rubber Property-Durometer Hardness, Planning Technology Inc, 13s. New Hampshire, ABD.
  • [22] Qi, H. J., Boyce, M. C. 2005. Stress-strain behavior of thermoplastic polyurethanes. Mechanics of Materials, 37(8), 817-839.
  • [23] Petrovic, Z. S., Ferguson, J. 1992. Polyurethane Elastomers. Progress in Polymer Science, 16(5), 695-836.
There are 23 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Hurşit Sefa Aydın This is me 0000-0002-4048-0067

Ömer Yunus Gümüş 0000-0002-3361-6528

İsrafil Küçük 0000-0002-1284-8880

Publication Date August 25, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 23 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Aydın, H. S., Gümüş, Ö. Y., & Küçük, İ. (2019). Eriyik Yığma Modellemesi Esaslı Üç Boyutlu (3B) Eklemeli Üretim Tekniği Kullanılarak Poliüretan Malzemeden Bir Yapay İnsan Kulak Kepçesi Üretimi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 23(2), 666-672. https://doi.org/10.19113/sdufenbed.540029
AMA Aydın HS, Gümüş ÖY, Küçük İ. Eriyik Yığma Modellemesi Esaslı Üç Boyutlu (3B) Eklemeli Üretim Tekniği Kullanılarak Poliüretan Malzemeden Bir Yapay İnsan Kulak Kepçesi Üretimi. SDÜ Fen Bil Enst Der. August 2019;23(2):666-672. doi:10.19113/sdufenbed.540029
Chicago Aydın, Hurşit Sefa, Ömer Yunus Gümüş, and İsrafil Küçük. “Eriyik Yığma Modellemesi Esaslı Üç Boyutlu (3B) Eklemeli Üretim Tekniği Kullanılarak Poliüretan Malzemeden Bir Yapay İnsan Kulak Kepçesi Üretimi”. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 23, no. 2 (August 2019): 666-72. https://doi.org/10.19113/sdufenbed.540029.
EndNote Aydın HS, Gümüş ÖY, Küçük İ (August 1, 2019) Eriyik Yığma Modellemesi Esaslı Üç Boyutlu (3B) Eklemeli Üretim Tekniği Kullanılarak Poliüretan Malzemeden Bir Yapay İnsan Kulak Kepçesi Üretimi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 23 2 666–672.
IEEE H. S. Aydın, Ö. Y. Gümüş, and İ. Küçük, “Eriyik Yığma Modellemesi Esaslı Üç Boyutlu (3B) Eklemeli Üretim Tekniği Kullanılarak Poliüretan Malzemeden Bir Yapay İnsan Kulak Kepçesi Üretimi”, SDÜ Fen Bil Enst Der, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 666–672, 2019, doi: 10.19113/sdufenbed.540029.
ISNAD Aydın, Hurşit Sefa et al. “Eriyik Yığma Modellemesi Esaslı Üç Boyutlu (3B) Eklemeli Üretim Tekniği Kullanılarak Poliüretan Malzemeden Bir Yapay İnsan Kulak Kepçesi Üretimi”. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 23/2 (August 2019), 666-672. https://doi.org/10.19113/sdufenbed.540029.
JAMA Aydın HS, Gümüş ÖY, Küçük İ. Eriyik Yığma Modellemesi Esaslı Üç Boyutlu (3B) Eklemeli Üretim Tekniği Kullanılarak Poliüretan Malzemeden Bir Yapay İnsan Kulak Kepçesi Üretimi. SDÜ Fen Bil Enst Der. 2019;23:666–672.
MLA Aydın, Hurşit Sefa et al. “Eriyik Yığma Modellemesi Esaslı Üç Boyutlu (3B) Eklemeli Üretim Tekniği Kullanılarak Poliüretan Malzemeden Bir Yapay İnsan Kulak Kepçesi Üretimi”. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, vol. 23, no. 2, 2019, pp. 666-72, doi:10.19113/sdufenbed.540029.
Vancouver Aydın HS, Gümüş ÖY, Küçük İ. Eriyik Yığma Modellemesi Esaslı Üç Boyutlu (3B) Eklemeli Üretim Tekniği Kullanılarak Poliüretan Malzemeden Bir Yapay İnsan Kulak Kepçesi Üretimi. SDÜ Fen Bil Enst Der. 2019;23(2):666-72.

Cited By

EKLEMELİ İMALAT VE GELENEKSEL YÖNTEMLE İMAL EDİLMİŞ TİTANYUM ALAŞIMLI MALZEMENİN ABRAZİF AŞINMA ÖZELLİKLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ
Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Tasarım Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.21923/jesd.1163332
 Download Cover Image

e-ISSN: 1308-6529